Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Review: One step lower than installment

Three years. Three years have passed since Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 released. During that time, Samsung returned to the laboratory and completely redesigned earphones, giving us Samsung Galaxy Buds 3. But the 3 buds are more than just redesigned. It’s more durable, looks better, and even get some artificial intelligence for good. Although she was in the open air, Samsung threw some of the strong National Congress Party when you need to reject the world a little. Thanks to the microphones included in the blades, you get excellent call quality.

The derivative design and short battery life are some of the largest defects that must be taken into account when thinking about buying galaxy 3 buds. It is not the cheapest earphones or headphones, but for people looking for a pair of affordable headphones with the exclusively designed for the Samsung system, there is nothing better.

Pricing, availability and specifications

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 is currently available on Samsung, Amazon, and Best Buy for $ 180. They are not expensive like their main brothers, Samsung Galaxy Buds $ 3. Instead, Buds 3 has stems planted firmly in the mid -layer. This means that its main competitor will come from AirPods 3 ($ 200), Sennheiser Accenetum Wireless Wireless ($ 200), Aker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC ($ 100), and Google Pixel Buds Pro ($ 150).

What is good in Samsung Galaxy Buds 3?

The buds are very comfortable. I wore them for a little more than five hours without any inconvenience. I like Samsung raised the durability factor on buds 3 to IP57 (dust and water resistance) from the last generation of IP52 (dust resistance and water limited). I would like to choose Samsung to mix clear and dark plastic for charging. Among the two colors, I prefer the white color, although the buds themselves, I am going to silver.

He listens. No, seriously, listen. Galaxy Buds 3 looks great. These, along with Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, are some of the best earphones that Samsung has made so far. This is what he mentioned, the 3 Pro buds are the best between the two, but still, the 3 buds do not count outside. For the purpose of testing my voice, I left the equalizer in the application on a budget during the flow of paths from the tide with sound quality in the maximum preparation.

Although Al -Jahir was slightly widespread on “Survive” for Childish Gambino (feat. Chlöe), the monopoly keyboard was not crowded. Gambino and Crossi’s sangs were clean, and there was enough sound to be treated. I switched Boomy with easy -to -drive tones, Alison Russell and Clearette Clearite on “Person”. The strong artist Alto was just a war away from Yodel with just a slight hint of blush.

The spatial sound is good, but it does not carry a candle for the likes of Sony WF-1000xm5. Then again, Sony buds cost $ 300. I will say when I listened to the classic 112 “Come See Me”, there was fullness that I did not hear Sans 360 Audio. It was more evident in “what is deep your love”, as I felt that the keyboard was on my left, with the strings on my right, and the Gibbs brothers were in the forefront and the center.

It is a little bit for the Buds 3, and it is a pair of open ear buds, to cancel the active noise, but we are here. I will definitely not go to POO-Poo in the feature and I am proud to replace natural symphony in New York City with my soundtrack and all of that. With the enabled the African National Congress Party, Buds 3 connects the needle and calm the loud city enough to qualify as a boring cow as it is enough to hear an angry and angry century from an electric scooter. Therefore, although it is not the best ANC earphones, it is effective.

The quality of the call on these things is amazing. I went on a call with my brother for an hour and 10 minutes, and during that time I took the dogs on a picnic and then went home and turned the TV. While the open ear design allows some noise from the outside world, it was very little, according to Bro My Bro. He described mysterious to hear the holes of criticizing a passing ambulance while I was walking at home and harming my TV, but only after I played it to the maximum.

Almost every piece of technology you face these days has a kind of artificial intelligence. Galaxy 3 buds are not different. Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro have some Samsung AI juice. However, buds 3 definitely have less than artificial intelligence than 3 professional buds. Some features, such as a translator mode, only work with Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 and Z Fold 6 at the present time. But regardless of the phone, you can access the African National Congress and Embolic Party, which are automatically seized according to the surrounding sound levels. Bixby Activating is accurate, but frankly, I am not a great digital assistant, whether Bixby or Google.

What is bad in Samsung Galaxy Buds 3?

Samsung has moved from shiny beans to irregular irregular mint into a brilliant airpods. Personally, I think Samsung should have been stuck with the distorted Mentos design. It is not a great look – they understand – I just hope that Buds 3 LEDs have LED lamps in blades like Buds 3 Pro.

However, as soon as they slide in my ears, I felt uncommon. I could not get rid of the feeling that if you move hard or slightly sweating, one buds or both will go to the wild blue wild that cannot be seen again – look for the advantage of its cursed buds. Seriously, both earphones slid up from my ears while walking, thanks to this in a small part of the sweat at the summer heat in New York City.

Samsung classified the buds 3 for six hours with the African National Congress and seven hours without. Increase this with the shipping status, this translates into 26 hours and 30 hours with a stop feature. This is not bad, in itself, but when you have Google Pixel Buds Pro (7 hours ANC/11 hours) and ANKER SoundCore Liberty 4 NC (8 hours ANC/10 hours of ANC), Samsung really needs to escalate its game.

Should you buy it?

If there is nothing else, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 proves that it does not need everything to an annual version. Samsung took his time with Buds 3 to make a pair of buds that have improved greatly on his predecessors. Although AirPods is biting, but in a more dense and more angle way, Buds 3 has a better sound and durability. In addition, ANC brings solid and spatial sound to this mixture with some light AI features. They are actually very comfortable.

But I hope that Samsung will find a better design than AirPods, especially because I was always worried about sliding from AirPods only from my ears. This, of course, until Apple threw some ear tips on the positives. But the more terrible the defect is the battery life. Galaxy Buds 3 has a battery similar to its predecessor, which, after three years, is disappointment. Ultimately, Galaxy Buds 3 is one of the best Samsung earphones available if you don’t want to get $ 250 for Galaxy Buds 3 Pro.